top of page

Find the original article below!

Short-term vs Conventional Glucocorticoid Therapy in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The REDUCE Randomized Clinical Trial | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | JAMA | JAMA Network


Summary:

This Non-inferiority Randomized controlled trial looked at the duration of corticosteroids for the treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD. They randomized 314 patients in 5 Swiss teaching hospitals.


PICOTT:

Population: COPD patients with acute exacerbation

Intervention: 5 days (Short Term) systemic steroids

Comparison: 14 days (Conventional) systemic steroids.

Outcomes: Time to next exacerbation within 180 days. No difference in time to death, the composite of both or recovery of lung function. Multiple exploratory outcomes.

Type of Question: Therapy

Type of Study: RCT – non-inferiority.


Interpretation:

In this RCT the authors showed non-inferiority of a shorter course of steroids (5 days), compared to a conventional 14-day course for COPD patients. There was no difference in the primary outcome of time to next exacerbation or any of the measured exploratory outcomes, including mortality, side effects, time to exacerbation, recovery of lung function. There was a shorter hospitalization LOS in the intervention, as well as less exposure to steroids.


Overall Risk of bias:  LOW

  • There was a difference in gender distribution in both groups. But no other issues. Likely random error.

  • Non-inferiority trial – with limitations inherent to the study design. Will probably not a big issue if there is a small difference in exacerbations.

  • Patients, caregivers, outcome assessors, data collectors, the biostatistician, and all other investigators remained blinded. Unclear if the treating team was blinded.

  • Small number of events for mortality and other exploratory outcomes, might be different if new studies are performed with larger numbers of patients / events.

  • The outcomes were analyzed both per protocol and intention-to-treat, which is the correct way in non-inferiority trials.

 

Context: 

At the time of the trial, there was no standard steroid treatment for COPD and patients were exposed to long treatments or tapers.


Teaching points:

·         Non-inferiority trials

·         Per protocol analysis


Verdict:

Somewhat settled - Might change with more data

Comments

Share Your ThoughtsBe the first to write a comment.

The information provided by Critical Thinking in Medicine (“we,” “us,” or “our”) on this website is for general informational purposes only. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, is presented as an educational resource and is not intended as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Please consult with a qualified healthcare provider before making any decisions or taking any action based on the information you find on this Website. Do not disregard, avoid, or delay obtaining medical or health-related advice from your healthcare provider because of something you have read on this Website.

This Website does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, physicians, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned on this website. Reliance on any information provided on the Website, its content creators, or others appearing on the website is solely at your own risk.

If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor, go to the nearest emergency department, or call emergency services immediately. We are not responsible for any adverse effects resulting from your use of or reliance on any information or content on this Website.

By using this Website, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer in full.

The Service may contain views and opinions which are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any other author, agency, organization, employer or company, including the Company.

Comments published by users are their sole responsibility and the users will take full responsibility, liability and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. The Company is not liable for any comment published by users and reserves the right to delete any comment for any reason whatsoever.

Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved. No part of the information on this site may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of the publisher.

Join us and be a part of the Critical Thinking in Medicine Team

Do you have any suggestions, questions or comments? 

Do you want to collaborate?

​

Contact us @ admin@criticalthinkinginmedicine.com

Help support the website.
Every amount counts!

Donate with PayPal

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

bottom of page